Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 17.521
1.
Addict Behav ; 155: 108047, 2024 Aug.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38692070

OBJECTIVE: Despite the high prevalence and comorbidity of alcohol consumption and anxiety, it is unclear whether alcohol consumption influences long-term anxiety. This study aimed to systematically review the literature on the long-term longitudinal effects of alcohol consumption on anxiety in adults. METHODS: EMBASE, PsychInfo, Medline, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched from inception to April 12th, 2024. Articles analysing the relationship between alcohol consumption and anxiety symptoms or anxiety disorder diagnosis at least three-months later in adults were eligible. Articles were screened and extracted by two independent reviewers with study quality assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. RESULTS: From 884 records, eight studies of mixed quality met inclusion criteria. One study using a sample representative of the USA population found low volume consumption was associated with lower long-term anxiety. All other studies used a convenience sample or a specific medical population sample. The significance and direction of the relationship between alcohol consumption and long-term anxiety in these studies varied, likely due to differences in alcohol consumption thresholds used and populations studied. CONCLUSIONS: A paucity of research on the longitudinal effects of alcohol consumption on anxiety was found, highlighting a significant gap in the research literature. Furthermore, existing research, primarily focussed on clinical subpopulations, has yielded mixed results. Further research is needed to explore the longitudinal dose dependent impact of alcohol consumption on anxiety using samples representative of national populations.


Alcohol Drinking , Anxiety , Humans , Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Alcohol Drinking/psychology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/psychology , Adult , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/psychology
2.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 10538, 2024 05 08.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38719874

We estimated the effect of community-level natural hazard exposure during prior developmental stages on later anxiety and depression symptoms among young adults and potential differences stratified by gender. We analyzed longitudinal data (2002-2020) on 5585 young adults between 19 and 26 years in Ethiopia, India, Peru, and Vietnam. A binary question identified community-level exposure, and psychometrically validated scales measured recent anxiety and depression symptoms. Young adults with three exposure histories ("time point 1," "time point 2," and "both time points") were contrasted with their unexposed peers. We applied a longitudinal targeted minimum loss-based estimator with an ensemble of machine learning algorithms for estimation. Young adults living in exposed communities did not exhibit substantially different anxiety or depression symptoms from their unexposed peers, except for young women in Ethiopia who exhibited less anxiety symptoms (average causal effect [ACE] estimate = - 8.86 [95% CI: - 17.04, - 0.68] anxiety score). In this study, singular and repeated natural hazard exposures generally were not associated with later anxiety and depression symptoms. Further examination is needed to understand how distal natural hazard exposures affect lifelong mental health, which aspects of natural hazards are most salient, how disaster relief may modify symptoms, and gendered, age-specific, and contextual differences.


Anxiety , Depression , Humans , Female , Male , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/etiology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Young Adult , Adult , Ethiopia/epidemiology , Longitudinal Studies , Vietnam/epidemiology , Peru/epidemiology , India/epidemiology , Developing Countries
3.
BMC Psychiatry ; 24(1): 346, 2024 May 08.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720293

BACKGROUND: Studies have revealed the effects of childhood adversity, anxiety, and negative coping on sleep quality in older adults, but few studies have focused on the association between childhood adversity and sleep quality in rural older adults and the potential mechanisms of this influence. In this study, we aim to evaluate sleep quality in rural older adults, analyze the impact of adverse early experiences on their sleep quality, and explore whether anxiety and negative coping mediate this relationship. METHODS: Data were derived from a large cross-sectional study conducted in Deyang City, China, which recruited 6,318 people aged 65 years and older. After excluding non-agricultural household registration and lack of key information, a total of 3,873 rural older adults were included in the analysis. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was used to analyze the relationship between childhood adversity and sleep quality, and the mediating role of anxiety and negative coping. RESULTS: Approximately 48.15% of rural older adults had poor sleep quality, and older adults who were women, less educated, widowed, or living alone or had chronic illnesses had poorer sleep quality. Through structural equation model fitting, the total effect value of childhood adversity on sleep quality was 0.208 (95% CI: 0.146, 0.270), with a direct effect value of 0.066 (95% CI: 0.006, 0.130), accounting for 31.73% of the total effect; the total indirect effect value was 0.142 (95% CI: 0.119, 0.170), accounting for 68.27% of the total effect. The mediating effects of childhood adversity on sleep quality through anxiety and negative coping were significant, with effect values of 0.096 (95% CI: 0.078, 0.119) and 0.024 (95% CI: 0.014, 0.037), respectively. The chain mediating effect of anxiety and negative coping between childhood adversity and sleep quality was also significant, with an effect value of 0.022 (95% CI: 0.017, 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Anxiety and negative coping were important mediating factors for rural older adult's childhood adversity and sleep quality. This suggests that managing anxiety and negative coping in older adults may mitigate the negative effects of childhood adversity on sleep quality.


Adaptation, Psychological , Adverse Childhood Experiences , Anxiety , Rural Population , Sleep Quality , Humans , Male , Female , China/epidemiology , Aged , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Anxiety/psychology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Adverse Childhood Experiences/statistics & numerical data , Adverse Childhood Experiences/psychology , Aged, 80 and over
4.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0302597, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722888

The outbreak of SARS-CoV-2, which causes COVID-19, has significantly impacted the psychological and physical health of a wide range of individuals, including healthcare professionals (HCPs). This umbrella review aims provide a quantitative summary of meta-analyses that have investigated the prevalence of stress, anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbance among HCPs during the COVID-19 pandemic. An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses reviews was conducted. The search was performed using the EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar databases from 01st January 2020 to 15th January 2024. A random-effects model was then used to estimate prevalence with a 95% confidence interval. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analyses were then conducted to explore the heterogeneity of the sample. Seventy-two meta-analyses involved 2,308 primary studies were included after a full-text review. The umbrella review revealed that the pooled prevalence of stress, anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbance among HCPs during the COVID-19 pandemic was 37% (95% CI 32.87-41.22), 31.8% (95% CI 29.2-34.61) 29.4% (95% CI 27.13-31.84) 36.9% (95% CI 33.78-40.05) respectively. In subgroup analyses the prevalence of anxiety and depression was higher among nurses than among physicians. Evidence from this umbrella review suggested that a significant proportion of HCPs experienced stress, anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbance during the COVID-19 pandemic. This information will support authorities when implementing specific interventions that address mental health problems among HCPs during future pandemics or any other health crises. Such interventions may include the provision of mental health support services, such as counseling and peer support programs, as well as the implementation of organizational strategies to reduce workplace stressors.


Anxiety , COVID-19 , Depression , Health Personnel , Sleep Wake Disorders , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Health Personnel/psychology , Depression/epidemiology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Sleep Wake Disorders/epidemiology , Sleep Wake Disorders/psychology , Pandemics , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Prevalence , SARS-CoV-2 , Meta-Analysis as Topic
5.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(19): e38099, 2024 May 10.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728477

Patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) experience not only a detrimental impact on their physical health but also a significant influence on their psychological well-being. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of IBS among university students, investigating the sociodemographic and lifestyle factors influencing its onset. Furthermore, it explored the potential impact of psychological factors such as depression, anxiety, and overall well-being on the prevalence of IBS. A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted at Saudi Arabian universities in November and December 2023. To collect data, an anonymous, validated, predesigned questionnaire was used. The diagnosis of IBS was carried out using the validated Arabic version of the Rome IV questionnaire. We used the Arabic version of the World Health Organization Well-being Index to assess the participants' well-being. We used the Arabic version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to identify people who show clinically significant symptoms of anxiety and depression. Our study included a total of 379 university students, 46.7% were female 86.0% of participants resided in urban areas, and 7.2% had been previously diagnosed with IBS. The prevalence of IBS among participants was found to be 31.9%. We observed a significant association between marital status and IBS (χ2 = 3.95, P = .047). Furthermore, the highest prevalence of IBS was observed among students majoring in literary and scientific disciplines (χ2 = 0.952, P = .049). Individuals with IBS demonstrate a significantly higher prevalence of anxiety (71.90% vs 41.09%, P < .001) and depression (64.46% vs 42.64%, P < .001) compared to those without IBS. Furthermore, people with IBS had a slightly higher prevalence of poor well-being (38.84%) compared to those without IBS (33.72%), but this association was not statistically significant. In multivariate analysis, having a family history of IBS [OR = 1.75 (95% CI, 1.06-2.87), P = .029] having borderline anxiety [OR = 7.58, 95% CI (2.12-27.06), P = .012] and anxiety [OR = 16.07, 95% CI (4.57-56.52), P < .001], and depression [OR = 2.97, 95% CI (1.13-7.83), P = .010] were the main significant predictors of IBS among university students. The high prevalence of IBS among university students was associated with a family history of IBS as well as depression and anxiety. Increasing awareness, multidisciplinary support, and access to mental health services is required to ensure university students' well-being.


Anxiety , Depression , Irritable Bowel Syndrome , Students , Humans , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/epidemiology , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/psychology , Female , Male , Students/psychology , Students/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Prevalence , Universities , Young Adult , Adult , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/psychology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adolescent
6.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 10764, 2024 05 10.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38730014

The COVID-19 pandemic has seen a rise in anxiety and depression among adolescents. This study aimed to investigate the longitudinal associations between sleep and mental health among a large sample of Australian adolescents and examine whether healthy sleep patterns were protective of mental health in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. We used three waves of longitudinal control group data from the Health4Life cluster-randomized trial (N = 2781, baseline Mage = 12.6, SD = 0.51; 47% boys and 1.4% 'prefer not to say'). Latent class growth analyses across the 2 years period identified four trajectories of depressive symptoms: low-stable (64.3%), average-increasing (19.2%), high-decreasing (7.1%), moderate-increasing (9.4%), and three anxiety symptom trajectories: low-stable (74.8%), average-increasing (11.6%), high-decreasing (13.6%). We compared the trajectories on sociodemographic and sleep characteristics. Adolescents in low-risk trajectories were more likely to be boys and to report shorter sleep latency and wake after sleep onset, longer sleep duration, less sleepiness, and earlier chronotype. Where mental health improved or worsened, sleep patterns changed in the same direction. The subgroups analyses uncovered two important findings: (1) the majority of adolescents in the sample maintained good mental health and sleep habits (low-stable trajectories), (2) adolescents with worsening mental health also reported worsening sleep patterns and vice versa in the improving mental health trajectories. These distinct patterns of sleep and mental health would not be seen using mean-centred statistical approaches.


Anxiety , COVID-19 , Depression , Sleep , Humans , COVID-19/psychology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Adolescent , Male , Depression/epidemiology , Female , Anxiety/epidemiology , Sleep/physiology , Australia/epidemiology , Mental Health , Pandemics , Longitudinal Studies , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Child
7.
BMJ Open ; 14(5): e081924, 2024 May 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38692715

OBJECTIVES: Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) can affect individuals' resilience to stressors and their vulnerability to mental, physical and social harms. This study explored associations between ACEs, financial coping during the cost-of-living crisis and perceived impacts on health and well-being. DESIGN: National cross-sectional face-to-face survey. Recruitment used a random quota sample of households stratified by health region and deprivation quintile. SETTING: Households in Wales, UK. PARTICIPANTS: 1880 Welsh residents aged ≥18 years. MEASURES: Outcome variables were perceived inability to cope financially during the cost-of-living crisis; rising costs of living causing substantial distress and anxiety; and self-reported negative impact of rising costs of living on mental health, physical health, family relationships, local levels of antisocial behaviour and violence, and community support. Nine ACEs were measured retrospectively. Socioeconomic and demographic variables included low household income, economic inactivity, residential deprivation and activity limitation. RESULTS: The prevalence of all outcomes increased strongly with ACE count. Perceived inability to cope financially during the cost-of-living crisis increased from 14.0% with 0 ACEs to 51.5% with 4+ ACEs. Relationships with ACEs remained after controlling for socioeconomic and demographic factors. Those with 4+ ACEs (vs 0 ACEs) were over three times more likely to perceive they would be unable to cope financially and, correspondingly, almost three times more likely to report substantial distress and anxiety and over three times more likely to report negative impacts on mental health, physical health and family relationships. CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomically deprived populations are recognised to be disproportionately impacted by rising costs of living. Our study identifies a history of ACEs as an additional vulnerability that can affect all socioeconomic groups. Definitions of vulnerability during crises and communications with services on who is most likely to be impacted should consider childhood adversity and history of trauma.


Adaptation, Psychological , Adverse Childhood Experiences , Humans , Wales , Cross-Sectional Studies , Male , Female , Adverse Childhood Experiences/statistics & numerical data , Adverse Childhood Experiences/economics , Adult , Middle Aged , Adolescent , Young Adult , Aged , Mental Health , Surveys and Questionnaires , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/psychology , Financial Stress/psychology
8.
Arch Psychiatr Nurs ; 49: 126-132, 2024 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38734448

BACKGROUND: The Covid-19 pandemic has represented one of the most stressful events of recent times and has placed enormous psychological pressure on doctors and nurses. AIMS: The objective of this work is to evaluate the psychological impact of the Covid-19 outbreak on Spanish nurses and doctors, and to identify factors related to their mental health. METHODS: The study is a descriptive study and examined 812 doctors and 768 nurses. The dependent variables were health-related quality of life, anxiety, depression, perceived stress and insomnia. Participants completed the Health-related Quality of Life-Questionnaire, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item-Scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, the Impact Event Scale-Revised, and the Insomnia Severity Index. Sociodemographic and Covid-related data were also recorded. Descriptive statistics, univariable analysis and multivariable linear regression models were used. RESULTS: A greater proportion of nurses than doctors suffered clinical anxiety, depression and insomnia (56.84 % vs 45.81 p-value<0.0001, 64.67 % vs 53.39 p-value<0.0001, and 23.04 % vs 18.02 p-value 0.01, respectively). Although in our study nurses were more likely to suffer clinical anxiety, stress and insomnia than doctors, our results nevertheless showed that there were no differences in terms of quality of life. Different factors related to mental health were identified for doctors and nurses. Nurses working in care homes or geriatric services (OR = 4.13, IC95% 1.71-9.99, p-value 0.002), and in services with greatest contact with Covid-19 patients (OR = 1.71,IC95% 1.10-2.68, p-value 0.02) were more likely to suffer depression. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that doctors and nurses are at high risk of clinical anxiety, depression, stress or insomnia during the Covid-19 pandemic.


Anxiety , COVID-19 , Depression , Physicians , Quality of Life , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders , Humans , COVID-19/psychology , COVID-19/nursing , Quality of Life/psychology , Male , Female , Adult , Spain/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Depression/psychology , Depression/epidemiology , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/psychology , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/epidemiology , Anxiety/psychology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Physicians/psychology , Middle Aged , Stress, Psychological/psychology , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemics
9.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0302266, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701039

INTRODUCTION: Mothers faced an increased risk of adverse mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to other populations. However, there is little data on the factors that placed mothers at increased risk of distress. AIMS: The present study explored a range of individual, familial, and environmental factors associated with psychological distress in mothers during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: This repeated cross-sectional study was composed of a convenience sample of mothers who completed an online survey that included a demographic questionnaire, an emotion regulation questionnaire, and the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress scale. The survey was administered during the second and third lockdowns in Israel in 2020-2021. RESULTS: The study included 575 mothers (M age = 39). The findings of a hierarchical regression indicated that individual-level factors, composed of age and emotion regulation tendencies predicted psychological distress. The family-level factors of household income and number of children in the family also predicted distress. In terms of environmental-level factors, COVID-19-related media consumption and school status (open or closed) were also significant predictors of psychological distress. Importantly, the results showed that the most important predictors of psychological distress in mothers during the COVID-19 outbreak were school closures, household income, and the use of adaptive and maladaptive emotion regulation strategies. CONCLUSIONS: The findings highlight the intersection of individual, familial, and environmental factors in mothers' mental health during crises.


COVID-19 , Mothers , Psychological Distress , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Female , Adult , Mothers/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Israel/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/psychology , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/psychology , Mental Health , Pandemics , Emotional Regulation
10.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0302020, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701106

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic changed the future of work sustainably and led to a general increase in mental stress. A study conducted during the second and third pandemic wave with a retrospective survey of the first wave among 1,545 non-healthcare workers confirmed an increase in anxiety and depression symptoms and showed a correlation with the occupational SARS-CoV-2 infection risk. This online follow-up survey aims to examine changes in mental distress as the pandemic progressed in Germany and to identify factors influencing potential changes. METHODS: Longitudinal data from 260 subjects were available for this analysis. Mental distress related to anxiety and depression symptoms, assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4), and occupational risk factors were solicited at the end of 2022 and retrospectively at the fifth wave. Categorized PHQ-4 scores were modelled with mixed ordinal regression models and presented with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: A previous diagnosis of a depressive or anxiety disorder was a strong risk factor for severe symptoms (OR 3.49, 95% CI 1.71-7.11). The impact of occupational SARS-CoV-2 infection risk on mental distress was increased, albeit failing to reach the formal level of statistical significance (high risk OR 1.83, 95% CI 0.59-5.63; probable risk OR 1.72, 95% CI 0.93-3.15). Mental distress was more pronounced in those with a previous diagnosis of anxiety and depression. Confirmed occupational risk factors were protective measures against occupational SARS-CoV-2 infection perceived as inadequate, chronic work-related stress, overcommitment, reduced interactions with fellow-workers, and work-privacy conflicts. CONCLUSIONS: The pandemic had a negative impact on anxiety and depression symptoms among the studied non-healthcare workers, particularly early in the pandemic, although this effect does not appear to be permanent. There are modifiable risk factors that can protect workers' mental health, including strengthening social interactions among employees and reducing work-privacy conflicts.


Anxiety , COVID-19 , Depression , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Germany/epidemiology , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/psychology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/psychology , Retrospective Studies , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Psychological Distress , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Pandemics , Surveys and Questionnaires , Longitudinal Studies
11.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0303011, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38743717

BACKGROUND: Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer may have poor prognoses and short overall and disease-free survival. Most previous studies focused on assessing the quality of life and health-state utility of the general population of breast cancer patients. The number of studies for HER2-positive breast cancer patients is negligible. This study investigated the health-state utility and its associated factors among Vietnamese patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. METHODS: We conducted face-to-face interviews with 301 HER2-positive breast cancer patients to collect data. Their health-state utility was measured via the EQ-5D-5L instrument. The Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were employed to compare the differences in utility scores between two groups and among three groups or more, respectively. Factors associated with patients' heath-state utility were identified via Tobit regression models. RESULTS: Pain/discomfort (56.1%) and anxiety/depression (39.5%) were the two issues that patients suffered from the most, especially among metastatic breast cancer patients. The severity of distress (depression, anxiety, and stress) in patients was relatively mild. Of 301 patients, their average utility score was 0.86±0.17 (range: 0.03-1.00), and the average EQ-visual analogue scale (VAS) score was 69.12±12.60 (range: 30-100). These figures were 0.79±0.21 and 65.20±13.20 for 102 metastatic breast cancer patients, significantly lower than those of 199 non-metastatic cancer patients (0.89±0.13 and 71.13±11.78) (p<0.001), respectively. Lower health-state utility scores were significantly associated with older age (p = 0.002), lower education level (p = 0.006), lower monthly income (p = 0.036), metastatic cancer (p = 0.001), lower EQ-VAS score (p<0.001), and more severe level of distress (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings showed a significant decrement in utility scores among metastatic breast cancer patients. Patients' health-state utility differed by their demographic characteristics (age, education level, and income) and clinical characteristics (stage of cancer and distress). Their utility scores may support further cost-effectiveness analysis in Vietnam.


Breast Neoplasms , Quality of Life , Receptor, ErbB-2 , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Female , Vietnam/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Adult , Aged , Depression/epidemiology , Anxiety/epidemiology
12.
Rev Esc Enferm USP ; 58: e20230290, 2024.
Article En, Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38743956

OBJECTIVE: To describe and analyze the relationship between pregnancy-related anxiety, prenatal distress, and individual resilience in pregnant women during the first trimester of pregnancy and compare it with the obstetric variable of parity. METHOD: Quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional study using non-probabilistic circumstantial sampling. A total of 144 women participated. The Prenatal Distress Questionnaire, the Resilience Scale, and the Pregnancy-Related Anxiety Questionnaire were used. A descriptive analysis with measures of central tendency was performed, and the reliability of the instruments was assessed. RESULTS: The average age was 33.57 years. 58.3% were multiparous and 41.7% primiparous. Anxiety was found in 21.5% and very high levels of resilience in 54.9%. Primiparous women showed higher levels of worry about the future and fear of childbirth than multiparous women. Pregnant women with high resilience showed lower levels of anxiety and stress. CONCLUSION: Pregnant women with higher levels of resilience show less anxiety and stress during the first trimester of pregnancy. Primiparous women show more anxiety and stress than multiparous women.


Anxiety , Pregnancy Complications , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Resilience, Psychological , Stress, Psychological , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adult , Pregnancy Trimester, First/psychology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications/psychology , Young Adult , Parity , Surveys and Questionnaires
13.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1371598, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38689772

Background: Humanitarian emergencies are a major global health challenge with the potential to have a profound impact on people's mental and psychological health. Displacement is a traumatic event that disrupts families and affects physical and psychological health at all ages. A person may endure or witness a traumatic incident, such as being exposed to war, and, as a result, develop post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). There is a lack of information about post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, and anxiety disorder in low and middle-income countries in humanitarian emergency contexts such as Mozambique. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of PTSD, depression, and anxiety, and associated factors among armed conflict survivors in Cabo Delgado, north region of Mozambique in 2023. Methods: A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted between January and April 2023 among 750 participants, who were selected by convenience. A face-to-face interview used the Primary Care Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PC-PTSD-5) to evaluate PTSD, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) to evaluate anxiety and the Patient Health Questionnaire - Mozambique (PHQ-9 MZ) to evaluate depression. The association between PTSD and demographic and psychosocial characteristics was analyzed using bivariate and multivariable binary logistic regression. We used a 5% significance level. Results: The three mental disorders assessed were highly prevalent in our sample with 74.3% PTSD, 63.8% depression, and 40.0% anxiety. The chance of developing PTSD was higher in females (AOR = 2.30, 95% CI 1.50-3.51), in patients with depression symptoms (AOR = 8.27, 95% CI = 4.97-13.74) and anxiety symptoms (AOR = 1.45, 95% CI = 0.84-2.50). Conclusion: This study reported that the prevalence of PTSD, depression, and anxiety were high. Patients having depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and being female are more at risk of developing PTSD. There is a need to integrate screening for common mental disorders in the context of humanitarian emergencies and its adapted integration of psychosocial interventions.


Armed Conflicts , Refugees , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Mozambique/epidemiology , Female , Male , Adult , Prevalence , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/epidemiology , Armed Conflicts/psychology , Refugees/psychology , Refugees/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Depression/epidemiology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Adolescent , Young Adult , Risk Factors , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
14.
PeerJ ; 12: e17265, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38708340

Background: The objective of this study was to investigate the inter-relationship between psychosocial variables and their impact on symptom severity and quality of life (QoL) concerning abdominal bloating. Methods: The study adopted a cross-sectional design with purposive sampling. Participants who consented and met the criteria for bloating based on the Rome IV classification completed designated questionnaires. Independent variables comprised health beliefs, intentions, health-promoting behaviors, social support, depression, and anxiety, while dependent variables included bloating severity (general and within 24 h) and QoL. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was conducted utilizing Mplus 8.0 to analyze the relationships between these factors. Results: A total of 323 participants, with a mean age of 27.69 years (SD = 11.50), predominantly females (64.7%), volunteered to participate in the study. The final SEM model exhibited good fit based on various indices (CFI = 0.922, SRMR = 0.064, RMSEA (95% CI) = 0.048 (0.041-0.054), p-value = 0.714), with 15 significant path relationships identified. The model explained 12.0% of the variance in severity within 24 h, 6% in general severity, and 53.8% in QoL. Conclusion: The findings underscore the significant influence of health beliefs, intentions, behaviors, social support, depression, and anxiety on symptom severity and QoL in individuals experiencing abdominal bloating.


Health Behavior , Latent Class Analysis , Quality of Life , Humans , Quality of Life/psychology , Female , Male , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Severity of Illness Index , Anxiety/psychology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Depression/psychology , Depression/epidemiology , Social Support , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Psychological Well-Being
15.
Inquiry ; 61: 469580241248124, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38712804

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has presented a globally challenging situation for human physical and mental health. Healthcare workers (HCWs) are affected by increased levels of anxiety, stress, and insomnia. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of COVID-19 on HCWs anxiety, stress, and insomnia levels. This cross-sectional study employed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Perceived Stress Scale 10, and Insomnia Severity Index to assess anxiety, stress, and insomnia among HCWs at 10 COVID-19 isolation and treatment hospitals/centers after the first COVID-19 wave in Jordan. A web-based survey was used to collect data from 183 participants. Statistical analysis of factors affecting the mean scores of anxiety, stress, and insomnia was carried using student t-test or ANOVA while factors associated with differences in anxiety, stress, and insomnia frequencies were tested using Chi-square/Fisher exact test. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the independent risk factors. Among participants, 97.3% reported moderate to severe levels of stress, 68% reported borderline to high abnormal levels of anxiety, and 32% had moderate to severe insomnia. The mean of anxiety total score was 9.8 ± 4.8, stress total score was 22.7 ± 4.5, and insomnia total score was 11.0 ± 7.1. Significant positive correlations were noted between anxiety, stress, and insomnia (P < .005). Female gender, migraine, less working years, increased time spent with patients, lower workforce, clinical insomnia and high stress were significant independent factors associated with anxiety (P < .05). Younger age, being single or divorced, heart disease, smoking, occupation (nurses), lower workforce, vaccination dose, and anxiety were significant independent factors associated with insomnia (P < .05). Increased time spent with patients, lower workforce, lower spouse and colleagues support, sadness due to isolation and anxiety were significant independent factors associated with stress. HCWs at COVID-19 centers had high levels of stress, anxiety, and insomnia. Appropriate interventions to maintain HCWs mental health are recommended.


Anxiety , COVID-19 , Mental Health , SARS-CoV-2 , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders , Humans , COVID-19/psychology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Male , Female , Adult , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/epidemiology , Jordan/epidemiology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Personnel, Hospital/psychology , Personnel, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Depression/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Risk Factors , Health Personnel/psychology
16.
Support Care Cancer ; 32(6): 333, 2024 May 07.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38713314

PURPOSE: To identify the symptom cluster among cancer survivors and examine their subgroup differences via network analysis based on nationally representative data. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 2966 survivors participating in the 2020 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). Participants self-reported the presence of 14 symptoms capturing four clusters (physical, somatic, sleep, and psychologic problems). Network analysis models were used to reveal the relationships between symptoms and those interactions. Network comparison tests were applied to compare subgroups. RESULTS: The core symptoms of the symptom cluster were fatigue (Bet = 33, Clo = 0.0067, Str = 0.9397), pain (Bet = 11, Clo = 0.0060, Str = 0.9226), wake up well rested (Bet = 25, Clo = 0.0057, Str = 0.8491), and anxiety (Bet = 5, Clo = 0.0043, Str = 0.9697) among cancer survivors. The core symptoms, network structure, and global strength were invariant between time since diagnoses (< 2 years vs. ≥ 2 years) or between numbers of cancers (1 vs. ≥ 2), yet varied between the comorbidity group and non-comorbidity group (≥ 1 vs. 0). CONCLUSIONS: Fatigue would be a potential target for alleviating other symptoms through a negative feedback loop of other related symptoms of cancer survivors. In particular, cancer survivors with other chronic diseases should be the focus of attention and strengthen targeted intervention.


Cancer Survivors , Humans , Cancer Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged , Fatigue/epidemiology , Fatigue/etiology , Neoplasms/complications , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/etiology , Health Surveys , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States/epidemiology
17.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0302065, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38718073

Although research has confirmed that the first COVID-19-related lockdown has increased stress and mental health problems in children, less is known about the longer-term effects of the pandemic on children's COVID-related future anxiety (CRFA). Because of CRFA's potentially debilitating effects, risk and resilience factors against this anxiety were investigated. To this end, n = 140 children (49% female) in 3rd and 4th grade classrooms in Germany were asked to perform a working memory task and to self-report about their CRFA and emotion regulation in December 2020 and in May 2021. More maladaptive emotion regulation in December 2020 contributed to the explanation of a high CRFA score in May 2021, whereas a better performance on working memory updating contributed a lower CRFA score later when controls were in place. These results were confirmed when children's CRFA in December 2020 was included in the prediction of their later CRFA. They suggest that maladaptive strategies of emotion regulation, such as rumination, may explain higher or increasing levels of CRFA, whereas efficient working memory updating may be an indicator of processing information in a way which shields children from CRFA-related thoughts. The concepts underlying these variables should be included in prevention and intervention efforts.


Anxiety , COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/psychology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Germany/epidemiology , Female , Child , Male , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/psychology , Schools , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Longitudinal Studies , Pandemics , Memory, Short-Term , Emotional Regulation
18.
Rev Colomb Psiquiatr (Engl Ed) ; 53(1): 47-54, 2024.
Article En, Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38724170

INTRODUCTION: The prolongation and consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic have led to an uncertain and devastating panorama in many populations, and the evidence shows a high prevalence of mental health problems in medical students. The objective was to evaluate the association between mood disorders and sleep quality (SQ) in Peruvian medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 310 medical students from a private university in Peru. The SQ was measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), while mood disorders were evaluated using the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21). All information was collected by online surveys and then analysed in the R programming language. RESULTS: The SQ results measured by PSQI were poor in 83.9% of the medical students. In the Poison regression analysis, the results of the bivariate analysis in men show that all mood disorders found the prevalence of poor SQ. However, in the multivariate analysis only stress (PRa=1.30; 95% CI, 1.08-1.57; P<0.01) and anxiety (PRa=1.34; 95% CI, 1.09-1.56; P <0.01) increased the prevalence of poor SQ. Women had a similar pattern in bivariate analysis, whereas in multivariate analysis, only severe stress (PRa=1.15; 95% CI, 1.01-1.29; P <0.05) increased the prevalence of poor SQ. CONCLUSIONS: This study allows us to observe the consequences that the COVID-19 pandemic is having on medical students in Peru. It also revealed a population group vulnerable to poor quality of sleep and bad mood, which in the future will impact on health. It is suggested to educate medical students about the importance of proper sleep hygiene and the consequences of poor sleep hygiene practices.


Anxiety , COVID-19 , Mood Disorders , Sleep Quality , Students, Medical , Humans , Peru/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Students, Medical/psychology , Students, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Male , Young Adult , Prevalence , Mood Disorders/epidemiology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Adult , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Sleep Wake Disorders/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Sex Factors , Adolescent
19.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(5): e2410145, 2024 May 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38713463

Importance: Symptom burden and its characteristics among survivors of pediatric cancers aged 8 to 18 years remain understudied. Objective: To examine the prevalence of symptom burden among young childhood cancer survivors and identify associations with sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological resilience skills, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional analysis using data collected from November 1, 2017, to January 31, 2019, in a survivorship clinic at a US-based comprehensive cancer center was conducted. Participants included 302 dyads of children aged 8 to 18 years who survived at least 5 years beyond diagnosis and their primary caregivers. Data analysis was performed from March 13, 2023, to February 29, 2024. Exposures: Diagnosis, caregiver-reported family conflict, self-reported caregiver anxiety, neighborhood-level social vulnerability, and survivor-reported meaning and purpose. Main Outcomes and Measures: Novel symptom-level burden, integrating the attributes of severity and daily activity interference using the pediatric version of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, global cumulative symptom burden, and HRQOL using the EuroQol-5D. Multinomial logistic regression identified characteristics associated with symptom burden; linear regression assessed symptom burden and HRQOL associations. Results: Among 302 survivors (mean [SD] age, 14.2 [2.9] years, mean [SD] time since diagnosis, 10.9 [2.9] years; 153 [50.7%] male), 186 (62.0%) had low, 77 (25.7%) moderate, and 37 (12.3%) high global cumulative symptom burden. Greater caregiver anxiety was associated with moderate (risk ratio [RR], 1.56; 95% CI, 1.09-2.24) global symptom burden. Greater neighborhood deprivation was associated with moderate global symptom burden (RR, 4.86; 95% CI, 1.29-18.26). Survivors with greater meaning/purpose were less likely to have moderate (RR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.29-0.61) and high (RR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.16-0.46) global symptom burden. The burden of individual symptoms displayed similar patterns. Low (Cohen d, -0.60; 95% CI, -0.87 to -0.32) and moderate/high (d, -0.98; 95% CI, -1.53 to -0.43) general pain, moderate/high numbness (d, -0.99; 95% CI, -1.69 to -0.29), and moderate/high worry (d, -0.55; 95% CI, -0.99 to -0.11) were associated with lower HRQOL. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of young childhood cancer survivors, symptom burden was prevalent. Caregiver anxiety and disparity-related neighborhood factors were associated with greater symptom burden, whereas meaning and purpose was a protective factor. Greater specific symptom burden contributed to poorer HRQOL. The findings suggest that interventions targeting resilience and neighborhood adversity may alleviate symptom burden and improve HRQOL.


Cancer Survivors , Neoplasms , Quality of Life , Humans , Male , Female , Child , Adolescent , Cancer Survivors/psychology , Cancer Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Quality of Life/psychology , Neoplasms/psychology , Caregivers/psychology , Cost of Illness , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/psychology , Anxiety/etiology , Resilience, Psychological , Symptom Burden
20.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 10171, 2024 05 03.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702409

Mental health issues are intricately linked to socioeconomic background, employment and migration status. However, there remains a gap in understanding the mental health challenges faced by graduate youth in India, particularly in Kolkata City. This study aims to assess the prevalence and associated risk factors of depression, anxiety, and stress among higher-educated migrant youth. A survey was conducted on four hundred migrant graduate youths aged 21-35 residing in Kolkata. Measures included socio-demographics and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21). Chi-square tests and binary logistic regression were employed to identify factors associated with mental health issues. The overall prevalence rates were 54.4% for depression, 61.8% for anxiety, and 47.9% for stress. Unemployed youths exhibited significantly more symptoms of depression and anxiety than their employed counter parts. The logistic regression model showed that unemployed youth, female sex, never married, and second- and third-time migrant youths were risk factors for high scores on the DASS-21. This study showed that mental health issues were alarming in the higher educated migrant youth. The study suggests the implementation of skill-based, job-oriented, and professional courses at the graduation level to prevent graduates from being rendered unproductive and jobless. Beside these, regular psychological support should be provided to the higher educated youth by the local governments.


Anxiety , Depression , Transients and Migrants , Unemployment , Humans , Female , Male , India/epidemiology , Transients and Migrants/psychology , Transients and Migrants/statistics & numerical data , Unemployment/psychology , Unemployment/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Young Adult , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/psychology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/psychology , Risk Factors , Prevalence , Mental Health , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Educational Status
...